Total Pageviews

Tuesday 19 July 2011

The Singapore that’s great for everyone, except Singaporeans – Part 1 of 2

by: Eugenie Yeo/
I start off by saying that I’ve always been a proud Singaporean. Perhaps more so after a 7 year stint in Australia, where whilst I grew to love the quality of life that the country allowed me; I gravitated towards the pragmatic sensibilities that Singapore stood for.







I gave up my Australian PR to return to Singapore, because in my trips back here I found that the comforts of accessibility and efficiencies; as well as the genuine intent to cultivate a more vibrant cultural landscape, very promising for an eager, wide-eyed 20-something.
In the first years I was back in Singapore, I found myself becoming an evangelist.
Friends both local and from overseas were often subject to my ravings about how everything just worked here. When people were dismissive and negative about life here, I always rebutted with the same argument based on the following tenets:
  1. An excellent education system – particularly for the foundation years. We worked hard without remembering that we did; we had time for hop scotch and zero-point; and extra-curricular activities that weren’t forced upon us. And when we got to uni (overseas), we were well-prepared for the step up in education, and were generally well-adjusted due to the exposure we received.
  2. Things magically just work. Public transport worked like a wonder; buses were comfortable, trains efficient, cabs in abundance and very affordable. And we didn’t have to deal with crippling traffic congestions on a daily basis. Chores that would have otherwise taken a mind-numbing amount of effort and time – like registering a business, renewing a passport, clearing immigration – were a breeze. I heaved a huge sigh of relief each time I walked towards the immigration checkpoints at the Changi because this experience to me, represented exactly why Singapore got it so right. Things like that didn’t have to be difficult or tedious.
  3. A place is only as boring as the people make it. Too often had I heard Singaporeans (and expats alike) whinge about how little there was to do in Singapore. Well, I found great joy in walks down Arab Street and Chinatown, photography excursions to old HDB estates and Tekka market, big cookouts at home with produce from Tiong Bahru. Run out of options? A short plane ride and you’d be on a (real) beach sipping pina coladas.
  4. Affordability. Apart from cars (which I thought had good reason to be priced exorbitantly because it prevented the massive congestions that plague so many other cities from Bangkok to Seoul to New York) – most of our basic needs could be satisfied reasonably. Public housing made sure that the general population of Singapore had affordable homes, public healthcare was fair and accessible, food (supplies & dining out) was hardly cause for concern.
In a nutshell, Singapore got all the basics down pat. There was little to complain about and hence little to distract you from going forth to pursue the important things in life.
It’s been 7 years since I’ve relocated to Singapore. In the past year, I’ve noticed a drastic change in the Singapore I came back to. Apart from Pt 3 above, I’ve had to retract everything else I’d so fervently preached before about life here. And here’s why:
Education – I’ve witnessed my own nephew and niece being ridiculed by teachers (we’re talking about reputable schools) and let down by the system. Both of them were diagnosed with dyslexia – and despite early detection and submissions of psychologist reports, educators had not accepted their disability, and instead isolated them and ostracised them publicly.
In an extreme case, a teacher had reprimanded my sister for subjecting her young child through a psychologist’s test. Any self-respecting educator would know that it’s far more effective to detect learning problems early in order to put in place coping measures.
This still brings tears to my eyes because I saw the sheet-white look of terror on my nephew’s face the night before a Chinese test – because he knew that he’d flunk it and be humiliated in class. I cannot hold in any regard a system that has failed kids so young –that we boast of being an education hub yet have educators that do not know how to deal with different learning needs.
The basic efficiencies in life – are no longer so efficient.
We experience, read and hear of countless complains about the laughable situation on public transport; or the frustrating cab shortage during peak hours.
I waited 90 minutes for a taxi in the city area one evening – I must have called the Comfort booking line 100 times; only to be told 2 things: use the iphone application to book, and that there were no taxis in my area. 


I saw slews of vacant cabs driving past, ignoring the desperate waves from lines of tired workers. The iphone app miraculously fails each time I try during peak hour. In the past 4 weeks I’ve had to wait more than 30 minutes for a taxi, almost wrestling down others like me who’ve cleverly decided to walk ahead of me to get an advantage.
Affordability – I am part of the unfortunate sandwich class. This is a huge point.
Housing: My partner and I have combined salaries exceeding the pre-historic cap of $8,000, and we’ve been looking for a home to start a family that would meet our budgets for a year now. Resale flats have become exorbitant (really? $800,000 is affordable public housing? Who are you kidding?), not to mention the jaw-dropping Cash-Over-Valuations (COV) that owners are demanding (average of $50,000, said one estate agent).
Which young couple is going to have cash for the 10% down payment + COV just lying around in their bank accounts? Do we not think there’s a fundamental flaw in a public housing system that’s pricing out majority of the people they were made for?
I understand the need to be competitive and keep prices subject to market forces but when those forces compromise a nation’s reach for something as fundamental as shelter, the model needs to be overhauled. Can we not explore a tiered system in public housing to ensure that the folks who are in need get properly subsidized housing? Is it not right to favour Singaporeans over non-Singaporeans; simply because this is public housing, meant for Singaporeans?
Healthcare: Whilst public healthcare remains relatively attainable, the quality is shoddy and apathetic. When my late aunt was hospitalised at SGH for a long bout of stomach flu, it took almost 3 weeks for doctors to find out/ tell us that she had stage 4 colon cancer. They first said she had a kidney stone, then liver infection, then liver cancer, then stage 4 liver-colon cancer. In a span of 3 weeks we were taken through all phases of the emotional rapids.
When we desperately reached out for medical advice and guidance, we were simply told that the doctors would do their rounds the next day and we should just stick around to try to catch them. If we were lucky, we caught them for 5 minutes. Usually we just had to come back the next day and wait again.
I truly felt as though we were being punished for not being able to afford private healthcare and hence only worthy of sub-standard, minimal attention. We had a loved one dying, and yet, we were reeling from being snubbed by the system.
In recent months I’ve read loads about xenophobic opinions towards foreign talent in Singapore. I have a particularly strong view about this – because I once was in the same shoes when I moved to Australia to study and work.
At that time, there was plenty of public resentment against international students and immigrants because of the perceived competition they brought to the locals. Then, I felt that the Australians just needed to grow the hell up and stop whining.
I have no issues with the government’s plans to target a population of 6 million (we know there’s no way that’s coming from increased birth-rates given most of us of marrying age can’t even afford a home, let alone think about making babies). I even think that some competition is healthy for a nation that at times has become obnoxious, complacent, and spoilt.
But the issue is that we haven’t yet developed the infrastructure to support this influx of people. Clearly, Singaporeans are bearing the brunt of sky rocketing home prices, over-crowded public transport and spaces, and lack of proper assimilation of immigrant communities.                                                                                                                  We boast of top-tier healthcare and education yet the regular Singaporean encounters something quite different.

In other words, the very things that Singapore once stood for, no longer stand.
And sadly, the Singapore I once fought hard and fervently for, no longer exists.
--
Be part of the community! Join our Facebook Page!

HELP keep the voice of TOC alive!

If you like this article, please consider a small donation to help theonlinecitizen.com stay alive. Please note that we can only accept donations from Singaporeans. Thank you for your assistance.

86 Responses to “The Singapore that’s great for everyone, except Singaporeans – Part 1 of 2”

  1. Ex-Aussie19 July 2011
    Ex-Aussie
    I am a Aussie, I know of more then 5 person like you. migrate to other country (think USA, Australia, New Zealand…). After spending some years there, in the end they still return to singapore. The grass always looks greener at the otherside, but in the end most will notice even thought singapore isnt perfect , the plus certainly out number the minus big time.
    You did the right thing leaving Australia, the last i check, Ms Juliar
    have decided to tax all Aussie A$9.90/week for farting and polluting the earth. If there a competent government in place in Canberra, i would have stay in Aust. Which would you rather have? The debt laden USA, the has been Europe, or the efficient red dot?

  2. political pundit19 July 2011
    The old days, all that is good of Singapore (efficiency, no compromise on quality, strong management helm by home grown talents) represented by SIA which flies our flag proudly.
    Grow Singapore the SIA way which build value for its shareholders (Singaporeans), not creaming them (Singaporeans) off. Go the Tiger Airways model and we are doomed.
  3. the problem here is not that singapore does not have enough talents,by and large.
    it is just that we lack ‘TALENTS’ in ther gahMEN?

  4. Ex Ausie… question – how come you write Singlish? Badly at that!!!
    “The grass always looks greener at the otherside, but in the end most will notice even thought singapore isnt perfect , the plus certainly out number the minus big time.”

  5. TKL talk cock19 July 2011
    cry daddy cry mummy but who solve your water problem? An ex-Malaysian did.

  6. Oz Oz Oz Oi Oi Oi!!!19 July 2011
    As far as the land area is concerned, Australia is TRILLION times bigger than Singapore; even the urban area of Adelaide (population 1.2 million) is about 3X bigger than Singapore, you cannot compare apple with orange. Australia’s population is mostly ang mohs that’s why there is public resentment because most of the international student and immigrants are from PRC and India, two Asian mega-countries with “billions” of population. If just 1% of population from both China and India combined come to Australia, Chinese and Indians will immediately become the majority race in Australia. So imagine just 1% of PRCs and Indians combined are allowed to come to S’pore to look for work……=O

  7. iVOTEahMENG19 July 2011
    now you ALL know..
    meself is a londoner corkney wannabe…
    lived/fight/stabbed/mained in chinatown/brixton(notorius african slum)
    came home to be a periodical son…
    endup pay and pay never endin in so many ways
    in london meself owned a little semi 2 bed single storey private property same designs as hairry porter home..drove a 1100 5 ear ole frenchie peugeot…
    still hav savin$ left enough for a decent weekends in paris/amsterdam or even salburg…
    ere @ home?

  8. Redemption19 July 2011
    Nice article!
    Waiting for part 2!
    @sustain
    It’s a waste of time engaging debates with you, because to you the PAP are gods and you worship them even when they ask u JIA SAI!

  9. anti-dictator19 July 2011
    can’t blame sustain
    like Hitler, this fellow is brainwashed and indoctrinated to follow the regime doctrine.
    it takes two to tango
    the other truth to this is that
    this individual is a PAP’s COCK SUCKERS

  10. It is a mistake that the author return to Singapore. You may earn more money but your quality of existence is demean when you are surrounded by many people like “sustain” that have no soul. Without conscience, he would label child with dyslexia as “laggards” and “underachievers”. It would be so shameful from the Australian ‘s perspective and culture. Even mentally slow children has a special place in Australia and they are not deprived of a free education and the society would not “label” them without compassion and care.

  11. At the end of the day:
    What is the quality of life for CITIZENS?…be it in Australia or singapore.
    What is the cost of living?
    What is the standard of living?
    What is the PPPI?
    Are Citizens oppressed?
    Is there welfare for the very poor?
    Is Medical Health Services available and affordable to ALL especially the poor?
    Look into these and decide….regardless whether you Like the Politicians in Australia or Singapore.
    Ultimately WHICH COUNTRY will let you live a DECENT LIFE?
    the truth is out there

  12. Such a well written piece. I am sure many share the same sentiments. I do. But after all the complaints, raving and ranting, what else can we do? Is there anything else that we can do?

  13. Your complaints have been there for years and years. The “high” standard of education is only from the “elite” schools, where as you stated, the teachers verbally abuse students who are not “elite”. The health care is only for the rich. If you are from the heartlands, a chronic disease will bankrupt you(without curing you). Why do you think thousands of professionals migrate to the US, Australlia etc.? They know that with LKY and the PAP, a dynasty will rule forever. LKY is still in power. All his cronies are in positions of power. Best you go back to Australia.

  14. If 6 million is cramped, wait it reaches 8 to 10 million. If we are having it bad now, wait till we have 35% of the population who are university educated. With the hierarchial pyramid still thin at the top and wide at the bottom, just see how stiff competition will be then.

  15. it’s true what u say all abt singapore, but all these are coz by ppl, of coz we can be more friendly, and helpful, but that need a change in attitude. many of us here are crazy over lossing to others.
    in aust, there are many poor too, but all in all, we more at home here than anywhere. most of all food court and coffeeshop!

  16. avexdevil19 July 2011
    wherever you may choose to live, one thing is certain, the population of the world has grown exponentially since the good ol’ days. we are living in a world of diminishing resources, and we are simply experiencing the inverse relationship between quantity and quality more than ever. While I personally believe the PAP has ruled over Singapore for far too long, realistically, things aren’t going to look that much brighter even with a change in government, due to the conditions and constraints already set in place. And sadly, the only way Singapore can continue to be the successful nation it has proven itself to be over the years is to systematically subject its citizenry to ‘an elite segregation’ process not unlike natural selection. With the lack of land area, Singapore can really only afford to accommodate people from two extreme ends of the spectrum. Quality labour (the ‘elite’) and cheap labour to provide infrastructure for the former, there’s really no room for the mediocre to lead a ‘successful’ or above average lifestyle over there. Singapore is in a Catch 22 situation here, hence it’s no fault of the government that stimulating the economy holds precedence over the comfort of middle class Singaporeans. And likewise, you can’t provide Singaporeans with a good life with a waning amount of land space filled with foreign talent that boost the efficiency of the country at a lower cost.
    If you look at this with big picture dynamics, the carbon and income tax issues in Australia pales in comparison to the real sustainability problem Singapore is going to have to face up to in the near future. Pick your poison, but as an ex-Singaporean, I can only look at this article and say, “I told you so”.

  17. Ex Singaporean20 July 2011
    @EX-Aussie,
    You are correct! The grass is always greener on the other side. However, do you know Singapore’s grass is green? With no apparent transparency in Singapore, on the surface, it looks green but underneath it could be brown. Right now, Europe and the US are in trouble, but this will ultimately affect Singapore too! China may be going into a bubble. 24 years since I left Singapore and counting. I wont go back for sure!

  18. The dialogue that this post has generated is incredibly humbling. It’s heartening (or probably more appropriately – disheartening) to hear that so many other Singaporeans face the same issues.
    @ hello – thank you for the honest response. You’ve nailed it, that the problem has to do with communication – and more specifically, communication with empathy.

  19. let’s pray for the soul of Sustain. may Sustain have a chance to avoid the animal realm in the next birth. om mani padme hom.

  20. True blue Singaporean20 July 2011
    Sometimes I wish I were a foreigner working in some high post here, treated with great respect and gettin a massive salary. Get a PR, speculate with the ever inflating property market, and at end of the day, retire back in my country when I had earned enough. Life would’ve been so great here…

  21. True blue Singaporean20 July 2011
    Sustain is just a nut. It’s already a surprise he or she even bothers to read articles here.

  22. HSI Trader20 July 2011
    i guess you just have to turn a blind eye to everything and make enough money to make your life worthy of the system. i had a minor surgery recently. the doctors were excellent and there was a presentation on my condition, why it was there, what they are going to do, the risk involved and who will be carrying out the op. THe cost was truly exorbitant but i have asimilar health insurance plan that i pay exorbitantly yearly and they covered everything. i only paid the gst.
    from diagnosis to ops is only 4 days. it seems there is never a queue in their operating room and the doctors are always available. i went Mt E if you are wondering where. SIngapore is truly a nice place but you got to pay for it, so the focus should not be how your fellow men could afford it but how you could afford it. whining together over real problems is not going to help your case.

  23. @HSI Trader
    Congratulations on your economic success. Your self-centered views and failure to internalize the sufferings of other certainly make you endearing to the PAP government. Like it or not, there are other Singaporeans who have the ability to empathize with their fellow human beings. It’s totally fine if you want to carry on this mode of self-indulgence but one day if you fall, I will still be there to support you.

  24. x-Singaporean20 July 2011
    I grew up in Singapore for the first 30 years of my life. All the ‘plus’ points Eugeine points out seems so far far away. Somehow I knew that no matter how many ‘pluses’ there are, it will never make my life better – just because I lived in an island with finite resources and an increasing population. That is just the nature of the beast.
    I read some of the comments (negative) towards Eugeine and I sympathize with her. Just lets me know the ‘real’ reason why I left.
    I am Canadian now – 22 years strong. Grass can be greener elsewhere – you know. There are negatives here. However, there are more positives. Most of all the people I know, work with and live with will never dream of speaking to me in this manner.

  25. The government has grown complacent because of the long years of success. They need to be given a strong reminder. Vote in a non-PAP linked President.

  26. We got caught. By greed, by our ego, our arrogance. We overlove the adulations and we crave for yet more adulations. We want to show the world we are something, that we are of a super kind. We indulge in big time complex overaching theme politics, small though we are, and we got trapped. To put it simply, we could have been more sober and move on at a slower pace and still preserve a quality existence. That’s not to be because we are ambitious. There is a price to pay for everything.

  27. Hi AJ, I presume you had a SG education?
    Speak for yourself then.

  28. You forget to ask the very basic of all questions: What makes it all work? The answer is – lubricant. If it is all a machinery, a very well-oiled machinery, then the lubricant that smoothes the cogs and wheels is… money. This lubricant called money is the most universal of all; it recognizes neither gender, nor race, nor religion, nor citizenship. And when things cool down, it can solidify between the cogs and wheels so that the the once well-oiled machine breaks down because nothing works. Have a good week ahead.

  29. Below is a ST article (dated 20 March 1997) quoting Tony Tan. I have added the unspoken hidden meanings and my own comments, in parenthesis and capital letters, in this article.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++
    DRAWING TALENT [i.e. foreigners] – THE NEW UNIVERSITY FEES.
    20 March 1997
    Straits Times
    On Tuesday, the two universities announced changes in their fee structure to pave the way for a single fee to be charged for all courses except Medicine and Dentistry. Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan, who oversees university education, spoke to reporters on the key issues, which we highlight here.
    THE university fee and admission changes announced on Tuesday are being made with one aim in mind: to attract the best young talent from Singapore and ABROAD [Tony's real aim is to increase foreign student intake with this new fee structure] to the National University of Singapore and Nanyang Technological University.
    Both will embark on new efforts to attract quality students FROM THE REGION AND BEYOND, to RAISE THE PRESENCE OF FOREIGNERS in the student population here.
    But Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan told reporters on Tuesday that Singapore students need not worry that the move will mean fewer places for them [Oh really!! Is Tony saying that we have unlimited university places? The HARD truth is, for every foreigner taken in, one S'porean is displaced].
    His assurance: every Singapore student who makes the grade will get a place in university [what does he mean by "makes the grade"? Obviously, the entrance hurdle can be raised so that fewer S'poreans can qualify to make space for more foreigners]. “NUS and NTU today have enough capacity to take in all Singapore students who have the capability to study at NUS and NTU and who can meet the entry requirements [again, see how deliberately vague Tony Tan is here]. There is no difficulty,” he said. [yeah, no difficulty....because those S'poreans who are ousted by foreigners just have to pay a lot more money to study abroad!! Of course our millionaire minister thinks it is no big deal]
    He added that the universities now had “more places available than can be filled by Singapore students [really???? Then why did so many S'poreans study in Australia?? Because they love to spend more on university education??] of the right quality and also by any anticipated increase in good quality foreign students [Come on. The really good ones would not choose to study in S'pore!]“.
    Dr Tan, who is the minister overseeing university education, said that the changes were necessary to build up the universities into world-class institutions [fast forward 15 years to 2011, are our universities any closer to being "worldclass"??? Hmm...where do our ministers send their kids to university nowadays? Harvard? Oxford? MIT? Yale?].
    “You can have the best lecturers, good facilities. But unless you have good students [he really means "good" foreign students], standards in the university cannot rise,” he said.
    So in admitting students, the universities will adopt a “need-blind” policy, to take in every talented student, with a guarantee of financial help if it is needed [we now know many foreigners are given generous scholarships funded by S'pore taxpayers, but how many needy S'poreans received sufficient financial aid??].
    “That is the main change in the new admission policy,” he said.
    The fee structure is also being changed so that all students except those in medicine and dentistry will pay the same annual fee of S$5,500 by next July.
    FOREIGN students will PAY LESS too. Asean students now pay 50 per cent more than Singaporeans and those from elsewhere pay 100 per cent more. But from this July, all foreigners will pay 25 per cent more than Singaporeans [so S'poreans ended up paying more and foreigners paying less!!!! Is this Tony's idea of "S'poreans first"] and, from next year, they will pay just 10 per cent more [S'poreans would be screwed again the following year. Unbelievable!!].
    This change is aimed at drawing foreigners who might otherwise be daunted by the cost of living here and the strong Singapore dollar.
    But Dr Tan said that the foreign students who come “must be better than Singapore students [are they??]“.
    The universities will cast their net wide for foreign talent, from neighbouring countries, as well as from China, India and perhaps even Europe and the United States.
    The universities will market themselves abroad, at educational fairs, by advertising and, when invited, by talking to students who might consider coming here. [see our govt goes all out to give full scholarships to foreigners, but stinge on aid to S'poreans]
    This is what good foreign universities do, including top American universities such as Harvard, Yale or Princeton, which come here to market themselves to junior college students. [the BIG difference is these Ivy League universities don't dish out full scholarships to applicants!!! Foreigners queue to get a place in these universities paying unsubsidised full tuition fees]
    Dr Tan said that the impact of the fee and admission changes would not be immediate [this is the only consolation he can give]. Students entering university this year would have already chosen their subjects, but he expected the message to get through to those in the first year of junior college or those taking O levels this year [of course the message will "get through" because they have no choice but to pay more].
    “It will take a couple of years before these two policies show any discernible results,” he said. [fast forward 15 years to 2011, what is the result, Tony??]

  30. @Sustain
    If our education system is so good as you claim, then there is no reason to have FT. The reason we have so many FT is that our education system is unable to produce TALENTS.
    On the other hand if our education system is truely good and producing the TALENTS, these people must be leaving the country to seek employment else where or local TALENTS are discriminated against. Either way, Singapore and Singaporeans do not benefit from the so call World Class education system.

  31. bORN tHIS wAY20 July 2011
    This is a nations where top to bottom “SELFISH” management.

  32. Everyone is self central in nature. Within this self central, we are united when facing an obstacle (the influx of foreigner workers). For the foreigners who are redundantly, please packed up and go home gracefully. Don’t harbour any hatred on us, please understand our situation.
    - We are not born in this way, rather we are make to be selfish in a tight market competition and “talk cock” gov.

  33. Everyone is self-centered in nature. Within this self-centered, we are united when facing an obstacle (the influx of foreigner workers). For the foreigners who are redundantly, please packed up and go home gracefully.
    - We are not born in this way, rather we are make to be selfish in a tight market competition and “talk cock” gov. They robbed of our happiness.

  34. andrew leung20 July 2011
    Singapore is not very stable. People are old and dying and the young are leaving. They are being replaced at 100% rate and feeling displaced. They are facing a deluge of foreigners. There is unfair competition caused by incompetent management. There is no additional support given for locals. There is no Singaporeans first policy. We are just being string along till we die. PAP only care for the 60% to stay alive. We are Survivor Island.

  35. Singaporean in Austrlia20 July 2011
    I think the author make a mistake in returning to Sg.

  36. Scientist20 July 2011
    Singapore needs rocket scientist foreigners, the rest good mid-level positions can go home.

No comments:

Post a Comment